Life is
a mechanism, an automatism generated by the universe. How a
mechanism, an automatism, can it induce the belief, as well the
mental function itself than the multiple religious contents imagined
in the world?
One can
imagine that it has something to do with the obligation to exist for
the sustainability of life.
We can
dare to create an existence only because we know that we will be able
to fool it without any problem, since the person created is born
virgin from cultural meanings. But by fooling the child, it is the
whole humanity which is fooled, that is called the beliefs.
The
mental function “belief” is a function which is opposed to the
reason. “To reason”, it is to seek and to bring arguments to a
theory without seeking to validate it a priori, its validation or its
invalidation will be done by the arguments.
“To
believe”, it is to validate this theory with absolute certainty,
and to deny, more or less imperturbably, the existence of the
arguments which demonstrate its falseness.
A
believer has the intellect frozen on the choice he made, forgetting
that a single small contradictory argument is sufficient to
invalidate any theory.
“This
believer thus declares himself infallible.” The believer believes
in his own infallibility. In religion, it is rather strange, since
most of them (all!) preach honesty, humility, and modesty.
The
belief must be conscious, otherwise it is only a basic automatism.
The child does not believe, it simply underwent the parental and
social indoctrination. Being born virgin of cultural meanings, the
child impregnates itself of parental actions, since it cannot make
differently than to record the model present in front of its eyes and
its ears.
Religious
behavior in its immediate environment becomes, just as the mother
tongue, the foundation of its culture. Its intellect is completely
impregnated. The main of this culture holds in a few words,
respecting parents, culture itself, and its fatherland.
To
become truly a believer, that child will make a conscious act of
acceptance and in front of others preferentially. It is not
indoctrination, it is a rite of passage with public enthronement
making it extremely difficult the disavowal.
The
word belief is used indiscriminately by everyone. It is employed as
the verb “do”, or the word “trick”, when talking vaguely,
which is the case most of the time. “I believe it will be sunny
tomorrow,” should be replaced by “I guess it will be sunny
tomorrow” or “I feel that it will be sunny tomorrow.”
To
believe that the weather will be nice is not a belief which one can
compare with religious belief. Rainy or sunny, we understand
perfectly well that we will know the next day. While the “tomorrow”
of the believer is part of his belief, that is the material death of
the living, which he claims to have the certainty of its existence.
It is
on the following day, after life, that is the certainty of a
believer. The believer needs this next day to clear himself of the
mistake he has made (or he'll make) by putting her child into this
world of misery. “The life that I gave you is not beautiful, but
paradise awaits you if you behave well with me!”
Most of
our pseudo-beliefs are simply the weighted confidence. For example, I
have never seen platypus and never seen a unicorn, but I'm completely
confident in the existence of the platypus that is nevertheless much
more incredible that a unicorn.
Similarly,
I trust the technical specialists, of daily life, which have more
knowledge than mine in their fields. The same with the knowledge of
scientists, who are also specialists.
The
existence of anything is not subject to a belief. The existence of
something is a fact or not, it's not by personal decision that the
thing exists.
Anyone
can believe in the existence of anything, but should in no case be
able to impose the belief in this existence and all those results to
anyone. It is not a question of secularism, it is a matter of
rationality and sanity.
There
is merit to behave well without expecting anything, and no to behave
well in the hope of a great reward, paradise. A signature obtained
with a gun to his head has no value. Signing for paradise, with hell
to his head has no value.
The
religious contents, bases of religions are innumerable, but much less
than the world's literature in other fields. We have all a propensity
to tell stories, with a lot of romantic fictions and fairytales of
all kinds.
For any
religion, whatever is told in other religions is only literature
unfounded, so that generally all religious texts, without exception,
are considered, from a democratic point of view, by all humans, as
simple novels.
If
humanity voted to accept the religious texts, one would obtain for
each, a broad democratic majority relating them to simple and bad
literature.
The
mental function “belief” is a kind of computer virus, which
blocks the thought on a religious content rather than another.
This
content is cultural, it is an impregnation. I believe in what my
parents and my direct entourage tell me, my brain is impregnated with
their explanations of the world, which is easy to realize on the
mental mechanics of the baby who is born virgin from cultural
significance.
Whatever
the reasons for giving birth to a being, it can only concern the
person who conceives it. Even if the child you create was born
immortal in a paradise without any risk, the question of the
dictatorship and the reasons for this creation remain.
The
brain's abilities allow it to analyze the reasons of existence. This
analysis allows it to understand the futility of existence and
therefore the uselessness of procreation. Obviously, those who do not
procreate disappear with their ideas, and only remain those who
invented a reason for the perenniality of life.
This is
why everywhere in the world, we find the ideas of immortality and
paradise, and incidentally the notion of free will that makes each
person responsible, and even responsible for its own existence...
Everything
must be forgiven, because free will does not exist (see demo). This
human pseudo-ability is a very old invention of believers. It is a
common belief on Earth still used today, by so-called secular nations
(mystery and misery of human intellect. Stupid human which imposes
the existence, therefore the free will that accompanies it!!!)
All
that is described is in the field of science, and, since thought may
be described, it is a science field, thought and all its contents
obviously. Religion, all that it produces, which is a chimera of
thought, cannot escape the science and its analysis.
God
capable of producing the universe, capable, meanly, to drown the
human world he has made before, therefore able to appear by obvious
signs, which God made known through speech, speech unveiled in a
pseudo-telepathy (prayer),
this
god who does not want to become known by the vision, touch, and other
senses, is an invention of numbskull, who seek to deceive. But why do
they want to fool?
What is
the use of the religions with their contents, what is the use of the
gods, and especially the mental function “belief”?
All
this serves to explain to children why one imposed them to exist when
it was not necessary, and to the women why they should continue to
give birth when they may die or get a pathology more or less
handicapping.
Life is
short, unhealthy, bellicose, your body and your mind are worthless,
but that does not matter because life is short and then there is
paradise, and you will soon be immortal.
Madam,
to have a child with two chances in a thousand dying at best, this is
called quasi-suicide, which is, I believe, forbidden by the religion.
Monsieur, to impose his wife this risk of two chances in a thousand
to die, at best, is a crime.
In the
world, there exist all the religious alternatives on this topic. The
invention of the writing allowed to fix the variations. But if the
signs do not change any more, on the other hand, the interpretation
of these books, abounding of foolery, depends obviously on the
reader.
Because
as everyone knows, the interpretation depends on the experience of
one who reads or hears. So there are as many different religions as
there are religious people.
The
funniest are the contradictions of this system: to impose the
children to respect the slavers that are the parents, who do not
hesitate to play Russian roulette on the head, the body of their own
offspring, they add multiple threats, gods who watch, devils that
appeal to do evil, and hell to live forever in suffering.
(But
why the heck would this Devil punish you for what you do then it is
not against you, but against God that he wants to replace (vizier in
place of the vizier)?)
The
mental function “belief” is a kind of computer virus, it blocks
reflection, and that is not complicated to carry out since it is
established in a virgin brain of cultural significance. A child
swallows all, since it is “impregnated” like the fledglings of
Conrad Lorenz. The proof very simple to give is the mother tongue,
impossible to escape from it.
It is
easy to deduce from all this that the cultural system of religions
and beliefs is used for reproduction, therefore to Life. Because no
really clever being can only impose someone to exist, and even less
to exist in conditions and with a body that are not controlled during
manufacture.
The
evolution manufactured us with our large brains able to describe and
analyze finely the world. The problem is that if we know of it too
much, we stop reproducing, thus the evolution made the belief which
curbs our correct analysis of the world.
Now
that we over-occupy the planet, we must unleash our large brains. We
have to remove the beliefs that make us reproduce like rabbits for
bullshit reasons. There are no souls, no gods, no heaven or eternity,
or free will... but we need this knowledge to change.
It is
recommended knowing as intimately as possible, using method, logic,
reason, the functioning of thought since we lug it with us. The
object of study is at hand, since constantly with us.
Whichever
way you give a child a physical or mental defect, even if you do it
gently with drugs, this is ill-treatment, it is a crime punishable
by law. But if a child is born with physical or mental defects, you
claim that this child has not been harmed, this is a simple mistake
of nature!!!
You
claim that this child does not have to complain about his parents who
created him, who gave birth while they knew quite well, consciously,
that this possibility existed for him to be born dumbhead...!!!
You
claim that this child is a human being without right, he did not even
have that to be born normal!!! The existence serves no purpose, only
for the one that already exists and is aware of that existence. Why
make exist a person with the slightest possibility of suffering?
This is
a huge mystery to me. Nature invented conscience, then belief to
prevent consciousness of being too conscious?
Life
does not think, it exists only by reproduction. Belief blocks
over-empathy, which leads to non-reproduction, and distorts realistic
explanations of the world in favor of fairytales.
The
creation of an existence that has the least bad luck to be born with
a physical or mental defect or any bad luck to have a miserable life,
whereas this creation is used only for those which already exist, is
the work of a fool or a sadist. Animals are idiots. Human aware of
potential prenatal ill-treatment are sadists.
There
is neither god nor devil, neither one nor several. But compared to a
god (supposedly good and right) that would have made us inferior to
him in all areas, we would be physically and mentally disabled.
In
creating us disabled from birth that god would be a child abuser. It
would therefore be a very big and despicable sadistic, and a vile
slaver, since a being created is created to serve.
Evolution
has produced the mental function “belief” to bridle our reason
which tells us that life is useless, never. Forced to play the game
of life and the social game that we did not choose, we have the right
and even the duty to rebel, to stop it.
The law
as it is, allows us to prosecute our parents if we are mistreated, we
are constantly. The society is complicit. On the pack of the 350,000
births of the day, 30% of babies are born disabled (abnormal) (100%
of these babies-objects are handicapped compared to adults).
Humans
must also provide at another wholesaler or better they stop
procreating. Heads of Governments and parents are so repugnant to
think that these 30% are just collateral damage.
Life
exists by the unchanged reproduction or not, that does not matter, as
long as life exists and produces life in a vicious circle, and even
very vicious when seeking to understand the usefulness of this
existence. This is where the problem of selfishness and empathy
arise.
When we
have a big brain we must ask selfishly if life is useful for itself
(“to be or not to be” and “would it really be worth living”),
and, of course, the empathy raises the question of why dare to breed
another person with all the risks of lack of mastery of the creation
of this existence, after all:
“Making
a life, procreation, serves only those that already exist, and nobody
masters this manufacturing made in blind.”
It is
there that the mental function “belief” had to appear, to block
this kind of reasoning. How to benefit at the same time from a large
brain and to continue to generate children with all the risks that
implies for the person created? There are no morals in the creation
of an existence…
Why a
woman does she want to become mom, and why a man does he want to
become dad, while making take immense perils with the one which will
be their very dear baby?
Even if
you create an existence by giving him perfect health, intelligence
and power, paradise and immortality, there would be only for your
personal use that it would be created. This is not the case, you are
not able to know what will come out of your “surprise belly”
Madame, you control nothing of this creation, just tripping.
Existence
never requires to exist, and certainly not under the deplorable
conditions which are offered to it on Earth, where it must, in an
astounding way, earn its existence, pay the debts of its parents and
the social debts contracted before its birth, and to guarantee the
retirement of its parents and associated.
And all
that incredible reproductive rampant stupidity to make the world a
hell! This is to die of shame to know that I have anything to do with
this...
There
is necessarily a difference between a human being resulting from
creation, and a human being resulting from the only mechanisms of the
universe. In the first case, we are created with features decided by
our manufacturer, and in the second we are the elements of the
universe adapted to it, because born from it, but without any
intention.
These
two entities cannot be identical. For thousands of years, we live by
believing us superior beings. We get educated by our parents and our
societies as divine children, me personally, I have no particular
power, I'm not telepath, and I have no free will.
I wish
I was educated as such. Humanity needs to clear the air from birth to
death. We must call everything into question, education, justice,
governance, etc. Everything is done according to the first scheme,
everything must be done according to the second scheme.
Today,
millions of people are stored in jail because our justice decided
that according to the first scheme they were responsible. It is
infinitely stupid to create a human, badly educate it, and to lock it
up by punishing it for faults of creation and education which it is
not responsible...
Why by
inventing the belief, Life needed to deny its own working which is
the material and cultural evolution?
Probable
answer: “We are just cooked to understand that it is time to stop
destroying, and we are able to manufacture a life without suffering,
that does not need to eat other lives for living.”
The
idiot did what his own body asks to him, orders to him, without
worrying about the other. The idiot creates an existence and to
exonerate himself with this person, he rationalizes his actions by
inventing twaddle.
If
there was only one question that all those, who wish to manufacture a
new life, were to ask themselves,
it should be this one:
“Now
that I have made a suffering being, how to undo suffering?”
Dead
end
E.
Berlherm (June 2016)
