The
subsistence income, or basic income, is an income obtained from
birth, to the new associate (to whom, it should constantly recall,
one imposes to exist) to live properly in the world, to ensure the
sustainability of its body, its intellect, its health, so its
protection,
to
live as long as possible under good conditions, in a healthy
environment, not warlike, and where this new partner, this new person
can enjoy this life that was imposed on it, to serve, while harping
that it must do its life itself, and to liberate it from its parents
who treated it like an object until his majority. What hypocrisy!
We
invented the concept of Right, as well as the laws and Justice,
without speaking of morals and of ethics. And since the Right and
Justice exist, they should be respected.
We
were put in the world, manufactured in any part with the Meccano set,
which is maternal food, to serve our parents and their associates,
i.e. the society in which they live. This initial servitude, is it
not pure primary slavery? Should we not recognize it honestly?
The
first reason for the basic income is justified is that we are obliged
to exist, obviously without our prior consent. The least one could
do, wouldn't it not that the world be pleased to welcome us before to
install us on the planet?
Would
it not be well that, at a minimum, this world is clean, healthy,
non-bellicose and friendly, that the "intelligence", that
we boast of being, wish to take as associates?
Why
else swinging this baby, this new person, in a dustbin, the Earth,
cradle of humanity, whereas yourselves you do not wish to be social
slave, and pay your body daily?
We
are obliged to exist, and, moreover, that is to be useful, but since
it is to serve in a world which rejects the slavery, which regards it
even as an imprescriptible crime, we should have at least a free body
for life (food and water), a free health for life, a free security
for life, all that is necessary to the life.
If
we are put in the world to reproduce the animal behavior with the
dominant ones and dominated, a hierarchy of humans, it is not
necessary to make laws.
The
second reason is that we all are heirs of inventions, tools and
concepts, which are in the public domain, starting with the invention
of language, of fire, of wheel, etc., and that we must share the
incomes of the use of these inventions which are constant since they
exist.
The
third reason is that we all work, more or less consciously, to
cultural transmission and its evolution, and the transmission of
language and its constant growth, which improves the logic of our
reasoning and science.
This
work must also be remunerated. We all also constantly take part in
the services within our families and in the society, when it is not
in volunteer associations.
The
fourth reason is that we invented the concept of society… This is
the absolute proof that we count the ones on the others.
As
this society is a continuous system consisting of people who all end
up dying, well, the dead must be replaced by new young associates,
to whom are not asked their opinions to exist, fill the gap, to
belong or not to the society and accept the rules, because on Earth
there is no out of society, all the terrains are already privately
owned.
The
worst undoubtedly, after this obligation to exist, is, that nobody,
no woman controls the blind manufacturing of this existence in her
uterus.
The
person to be born is like a soldier who goes on the road to war (the
road of life), it may undergo more or less serious handicaps in the
womb, probably treated as damage which is self-evident, a collateral
damage in this war of life against life, by its own mother, and
complicit governments that need associates. Madam, are you a soldier,
an army general?
The
child is brought into the world to serve. He will serve that he
wants it or not.
Please,
do not say you give us life, whereas you do nothing but trigger it.
If you really give it to us, give it until the end of life, with
sound body, sound mind, healthy environment, interesting life,
without being social slaves in need simply to survive.
If
there was only one question that all those, who wish to manufacture a
new life, were to ask themselves, it should be this one:
"Now
that I have made a suffering being, how to undo suffering? "
Dead
end
E.
Berlherm (July 2016)
