What
is money? It is first, the materialized or digital recognition, that
is to say recorded, for a service rendered to others. Service can be
time spent by using body or intellect, or indirectly a loan of money
or material, etc.
Then,
it is the possibility of using this recognition of rendered service,
as a debt due from anyone else who is willing to settle that debt in
exchange for the money representing this recognition. Money
represents a flying debt that everyone can share, and is never
canceled.
This
money or acknowledgement of debt can therefore run until death and
never be refunded to the person having this social acknowledgement of
debt.
It
is also possible by inheritance to earn this money or social
recognition of debt without having ever worked, that is to say
without having ever rendered any service to anyone,
as
it is also possible, conversely, with this system, to have a social
debt inherited from birth and having to pay by simply having been
forced to exist with social complicity, by debtor parents.
Recall,
incidentally, that believers discard their educational errors about a
person, their child, that they forced to exist, being born virgin
from cultural meanings with unwanted faculties, claiming that free
will reached this new member as a divine grace, as soon as they are
fed up with not being able to get from it what they wanted.
We
cannot yet be heir of parental and social debts at birth, without
being, similarly, heir of everything that the culture produced,
starting from fire, wheel, glass, paper, etc.
The
society is, it, always creditor, at least should be, since it makes
money, which is quite practical. That of which it should benefit for
the good of all, to erase inequalities. But the society has delegated
(unintentionally?) to private banks for more than 85%, the production
of an impalpable money, since digital.
(Read
the Nobel prize Maurice Allais, who does not hesitate to compare the
bankers to counterfeiters) (And I add for my part, that, since the
system works globally, it means that the salary of people on the
planet is devalued accordingly).
The
simple obligation to exist makes you debtors, which is called the
social slavery, which is amplified by the second fact, that is, when
you are able, having to work to buy your body, i.e. feed it.
Do
not worry, one won't charge you for the air, only solid and liquid.
After mom-dad threw you in nature, you have for three days before
dying of thirst, that's enough to find a job...
The
flaws of this system are numerous. The one who understands them, and
knows the art of plucking a patsy, can enjoy it at leisure.
Obviously
it is better to be finance specialist than being bakery specialist.
It takes you as long to learn one of these professions, but you will
amass millions, even billions, more easily if you are in the bread
rather than flour.
What
is the money for all of us? For a farmer, a worker, a teacher, a
manager, a boss, a banker, a shareholder, a minister, a
parliamentarian, a judge, a policeman, a lawyer, a mannequin, an
artist, a sportsman, a former sportsman , a poor man,
a
rich man, an owner, a tenant, a homeless, a sick, a disabled from
birth, a disabled from life, a healthy, a suicidal, a dying man, a
third-world, a fourth-world, a tourist, a vacationer, a genius, an
idiot, a philosophical writer.
The
bosses' salaries is a compulsory levy on the labor of the workers, it
is not the workers who democratically decide the salary of their
boss. This is essentially the same principle for bankers,
shareholders, parliamentarians, ministers, the President, and all
civil servants, and others I've certainly forgotten.
If
all the customers of a bank check the presence of their money at the
same time, they will see that their account is provisioned, which is
a lie of the bank since the bank could not refund everyone, if all
the depositors wanted to clean out their account simultaneously.
Some
people are paid according to the actual work they do, others are paid
according to what they produce, others are paid according to time
that they pass in the society, others are paid according to what is
bought to them, others are paid according to the pleasure which they
give to the spectators or to the listeners and according to their
number,
others
are paid to work others, others to supervise them, some are paid
according to their manual skill, some are paid for their imaginary,
their inventiveness, their force, their glibness, their physical
beauty, their only celebrity, etc.
Why?
Human isn't it human, human that those who already exist have
constrained to exist to be partners on equal terms?
A
pleasant example: you are a singer songwriter. It takes six months to
compose a beautiful song (according to you). But then, little back in
time, we are in the Middle Ages. The minstrel, you are, strolls from
castles to village squares, and "makes his grub" from day
to day, and hit the sack in the stables.
Modern
time: you print your song on thousand DVDs, distribute them in
commerce, and if it works you print a million, and why not
seven-billion! You did the same job as the minstrel, but have
multiplied like hotcakes, you are Jesus Christ the son of the god of
song.
Why
do your six months of labor are worth more than mine, me the baker?
All this simply because you are able to print the "result"
of your work (it's not your job that you repeat) in as many copies as
you want? And it's not even you, who make the backbreaking job of
multiplication, unlike the baker!
There
are even more profitable, don't even need to make records, you sing,
or play football, on TV, and you get paid according to TV ratings by
SACEM or equivalent. Isn't she beautiful this rip-off?
Why
send a word in 2000 ears, it should be worth more than sending a word
in both ears? It is not you who do more work, it is the air or the
electron which transports the sound.
Money
does not only represent the visible product of people's work, it also
represents the time that we spend to produce ideas, or other
invisible forms and especially not measurable of human activity. Who
measures ?
Getting
rich, it is to impoverish others. And the money representing the
work, it is forcing the poor to work more and more to get the minimum
subsistence level, thus make it your slave.
It
is easy to demonstrate that, enriching people, even without losing
anything ourselves, apparently, impoverishes us ineluctably.
The
progression of poverty is as invisible and inexorable as the advance
of the small hand of the clock, contrary to the advance of the wealth
of some that is seen as much that the progress of the sweep seconds
hand of the clock.
For
example, you buy your seat for a show, a football match, being
perfectly voluntary to pay, without going into debt, and you enrich
the footballer. Ostensibly, you lose nothing, but where goes the
money of the footballer?
It's
worse than enrich a person on the other end of the world, there is
very little chance that this money comes back in your personal
circuit.
The
money is the result of Murphy's law regarding the exchanges between
humans. Humanity itself is the culmination of Murphy's Law produced
by Evolution.
Money
is a prehistoric concept. It probably represented a kind of barter,
in fact the memory of this barter. Money is now a leading cause of
human misery.
The
concept was completely misguided. He serves to measure the food,
health, work, that of the man or machine, and objects, and among
these objects, countless totally superfluous.
It
also measures the pleasure, relaxation, recreation. Money is a
concept that is used both to measure the concrete one as the
abstract. The money is mainly used to amalgamate the vital and the
superfluous, the real and the virtual. To change the world, we must
fully reexamine this concept, to perhaps split it into two...
Perhaps
two currencies would be needed, one for vital and one for the
superfluous, one to measure life and another to measure frivolous.
The first would be a serious matter and the second a game ... Today,
only the second exists, but many of us are dying of this stupid game
between billionaires!
But,
they retort: “we, also, were constrained to exist, just like the
poor bastards whom we trick, and since they continue to make
children, it is that they agree to be gullible, if not, they would
change the rules of the game, and forced us “democratically” to
accept.”
Divide
the money into two types of currency, vital and superfluous, is a
hypothesis that must be considered by its ethical side first. For
Justice, it must be applied, regardless of the economic impact on the
moment. Tens of billions of people to come will thank us.
Money
is a symbol which was set up in small groups of humans. Very few
people lived on Earth at the time of the invention of money. Today
this symbol, valid in the past, is used in two forms by billions of
people. It rots the life of billions of people.
What
was valid in prehistory no longer is today. We must cancel everything
and start from scratch. Any world political management is based on
the economy based itself on this prehistoric symbol. We must change
that. The money symbolizes both the vital and superfluous, and that
is not normal.
We
cannot sell or buy life, we cannot sell or buy what represents us,
our life. This rice, this soup, this salad as soon as they crossed
our mouth, it is us. By habit, and because we cannot do otherwise, we
buy a ring, a table, a DVD, a kilo of apples, a pizza with the same
currency.
We
even represent the game by money, whereas people starve to death not
to have some. TV entertains us with gambling. It's filthy. This is
blind slavery. We do not even realize our stupidity when we do this
immoral action, to confuse superfluous with vital.
Money
represents the work of people, and the freedom of some stops where
the freedom of others starts. If there is one thing that must be
controlled, it is money. The "monetary liberalism" is the
leitmotif of slave traders.
Why
the rich would have complexes to get richer, since you persist in
mass reproduction to provide them slaves? Obviously, as long as the
poor will recur, they will give reason to the rich.
Because
reproducing, it is to accept the rules of the world in which we live
by imposing them to a person who did not even ask to exist, and who
will bear these stupid rules that you impose, you poor, forcing it to
exist, your own child. (Is that clear enough?)
There
is, however, no reason that there are poor people because the money
is public, made by the State, and we are forced to exist, therefore
forced to feed us every day, which is known to all, and, of course,
from the government in charge of social management, so new entrants.
The
mere anticipation of birth, requested by the State, the society,
implicitly but definitely, implies the forecast of the food for this
person throughout its life, the forecast of its wellness and its
security.
The
money, which represents food, welfare, and safety should be available
for each individual without it having to ask, since it was forced to
exist.
Today,
there is no need to compel by force the people to work, there is no
need to tell them, the dumb money has replaced the vociferous
dictatorship. If you want to eat, if you want money, work! There is
no place where you can install freely to live, to shelter and
cultivate your parcel of land.
Your
parents know it. Have they prepared your part of Earth cradle before
imposing you to exist? Is it healthy and clean this cradle? Is it
hygienic? Isn't it dangerous? Because you know that the endangerment
of the lives of others is an offense, and a crime when that offense
leads to suffering and death? You, the child of your criminal
parents, you are an "other".
When
one speaks of "liberalism", it should be understood that
this kind of "liberalism" is the opposite of freedom and
equality. This "liberalism" is a liberalism of competition,
and therefore hierarchy of people.
Even
if we left all pretty much on an equal footing at birth, it is
impossible that there is a billionaire spot for all, a president
place for all, an island paradise for all.
We
are not in a meritocratic system, but in a random system (lottery of
life) and martingalocratic, that is to say, if you have the chance to
have wealthy parents or you have the chance to fall on the martingale
that allows you to discover how to get the most out of others, well,
you've won the game of human society.
Money
seems a necessary evil to exchange the work, but is it really
necessary?
Could
we keep the money as a labor-exchange system and abolish capitalism,
that is to say, how to remove the weaknesses of this system of
calculation of trade, and to ensure that the calculating men, the
profiteers are excluded (or controlled) as they are, in casinos, when
they are identified?
When
money is handled as a virtual product, it is forgotten that it
represents the work. How not to forget? How to ensure that the
accumulation of money is seen as what it is, that is to say indirect
and hidden slavery?
If
the entire human society is regarded as a casino by the millionaires
and billionaires, well, made as in casinos, exclude those who cheat
and found a martingale !!! Prohibit cheating, luck, inheritance,
martingale. Outlaw enrichment, which is nothing less than slavery,
imprescriptible crime against humanity.
If
the entire human society is regarded as a casino by the millionaires
and billionaires, well, made as in casinos, exclude those who swindle
and found a martingale !!! Prohibit cheating, luck, inheritance,
martingale. Outlaw enrichment, which is nothing less than slavery,
imprescriptible crime against humanity.
All
taxes are taxes on income: The actual VAT on a product depends on the
income of individuals. VAT is a progressive income tax (progressive
opposite of decreasing, but that is the opposite of social progress).
If
your salary is 1,000 dollars and you buy an item of $ 5,000, a 20%
VAT will cost you 100% of your salary, which is the real tax on your
income, whereas if you earn 10,000, the VAT cost you "only"
10% of your income.
Normally,
taxes, they say, should not be confiscatory... But who requires you
to buy food and water, but also electricity, gas, and paying rent and
charges which cost more than 80% of your salary or pension? No one !
When
you realized that you had to work to live, why did you not commit
suicide? If you have not done, it is that you accept the principle of
being tricked by all these nice people.
If
there was only one question that all those, who wish to manufacture a
new life, were to ask themselves, it should be this one:
"Now
that I have made a suffering being, how to undo suffering? "
Dead
end
E.
Berlherm (July 2016)
