“I
am Josef Mengele, the sad doctor experimenter Nazi of Auschwitz. I
amputate your legs surgically, you can still live. I amputate your
right arm, you can still live ...”
"It's
always me, the henchman Adolf. I amputate you one kidney, you can
still live. I amputate you ears and eyes, you can still live ... Why
do you complain, you can still eat and defecate? "
What
are you complaining since you could have been born thus, and that you
would not have said anything to your mother, and that the society
would not have had anything to complain, since that been part of the
risks that it accepts for itself? You are only one of its members.
And doesn't one do what one wants of the parts of his body?
For,
this amiable society does not consider you as a separate individual
that has to be absolutely perfectly formed, but may as well be a part
necrosed of itself, an acceptable error, a collateral damage!
The
disabled birth-child questioning his mother:
"Tell
Mom, why I have not two eyes like everyone else? Tell Mom, why I
have not two arms like everyone else? Tell Mom, why I'm in the
hospital and I have no boyfriend? Tell Mom, why? "
Answer
of the mother “…”
Mengele
had the opened eyes when it operated. Mother-to-be, she, works blind,
or, rather, it is her uterus which operates, and Mom made him
absolute confidence.
You
could as well have been this child born without legs, without eyes or
ears. When Mom makes your existence, it is a possible result, she did
not expect, but it's perfectly possible.
Daily
quantities of beings almost human physically, are introduced so
clueless in Life. Is it possible to compensate for this free
manufactured misery? Of course not !
A
mother who has generally not wanted to handicap her child, conceived
this baby, who does not have, him, certainly wanted to exist in these
conditions, because he does not even wish to exist. He was forced to
exist by someone who will want that, this miserable maggot
incomplete, calls her, "Mom", despite this absolute
failure.
Who
is the monster? Who made Elephant man? Who made Mengele? Who played
Russian roulette on the embryo and has made a runt? It's “Mom” !
Pain
and suffering are not visible phenomena.
An
important point is who decides what is handicap, the society or the
individual. For society, the handicap has two forms, absolute
handicap, and handicap related to age.
The
absolute handicap is when you are missing an aspect of being that is
present in the average of other humans called normal people, this may
be physical or mental.
The
handicap relating to the age is on the same principle, but in your
age bracket, normality is then based on your age bracket.
To
simplify, there are normal babies, normal teens, normal adults, and
normal elderly.
But
relatively, the baby as the old man are handicapped physically
compared to the young adult. And also relatively, if one considers
the age where an intellect is achieved, the others are handicapped
before and after this age bracket.
And
more subtly, we all are handicapped intellectually or physically
compared to the best of ourselves of the course of our life.
We
all are handicapped also, in a field or another, compared to the best
of us, as well intellectually as physically. There is always better
than us, and, when one among us is described as superior to the
others, that never lasts very long.
This
kind of human faculties is not very stable. And aren't we all
handicapped compared to what we would like to be? Aren't we
handicapped of wings which we do not have? Aren't we handicapped of
aptitudes of the fabulous beings and divinities whom we imagined?
I
myself decided to feel handicapped of these abilities. So my mother
made me deliberately handicapped by creating me human.
Nobody
may choose in my place, Nobody may decide for you what you feel as
normal or as a handicap.
And
yet my own mother begot me, and the society did nothing to prevent
the risk on others (me), instead it has a strong incentive to make my
existence handicapped to serve it, only for serve them as
experimental flesh for Mom, and for society, of flesh for job, of
flesh for tax, and cannon fodder.
If
you make a deliberate suffering on others, it is a deliberate crime,
if you produce it involuntarily, it is always a crime, even
involuntary.
But
if you produce an action of which you know that it can generate, then
there it is also a voluntary crime, because it would be well too easy
to pretext that you had not betted negatively on the glass half
empty.
A
bottle half empty or half full is not a question of pessimism or
optimism, in all cases the amount of liquid is the same, and what
matters is the impact on others and not your personal state of soul.
The
difference with regard to you is how you'll pay the crime, but for
the victim, there is no difference, his suffering will be the same,
regardless of how it is compensated.
It
is not even as you consider disability, whether committed before or
after birth. But the term of criminal, if it is the parents who
commit this action to impose suffering on others, should be applied
to them.
A
mother who gives birth to a handicapped child is an "intentional"
criminal. The society is also responsible for complicity of
intentional crime.
And
it's even more true to society because every day many are born with
disabilities very seriously and are generated with its request.
Because procreation has also become a social demand and not just an
individual animal act.
The
culture and social environment are strongly centered on procreation.
Life is only replication. We are members as soon our conception, but
our partnership shares at birth are never equal…
Of
which right does someone else can it decide for you of your
suffering, your death, or even your hell? Of which right do you take
the unilateral decision to make my life quite simply, but also height
of sadism to me to exist, whatever the consequences for me?
Do
handicapped birth people have the right to require and claim the head
of the persons in charge of their daily misery and suffering? Why not
? Why the famous law of retaliation, based on our judicial systems,
will it not be applied to this case? Aren't the creators of
existences thus free?
If
they are free, it is that they inserted voluntarily the head of their
own child in the terrestrial sludge, do not tell me that they did not
know that the handicap was not a known alternative, a lottery. Do not
tell me that they did not know that this lunatic lottery could not
arrive to the person whom they manufactured blind!
We
are not any more with the damaged first of birth. There is no longer
any surprise about his physical or mental impairments, it is every
day that the ax falls on the head of thousands of babies.
One
should not say: “Oh! But what a misfortune my poor Lady! What did
you make to the good God to deserve this punishment?”
But
rather: “Oh! But what you are as bitch as sadistic my poor Lady!
See what you did with this poor innocent who did not ask to exist.”
Create
an existence is the worst rape, the worst of crimes.
If
your future child has a chance on a million to have a weak body, do
not do it. If your future child has a chance on a million, of having
an intelligence donkey mentally disabled, do not do it.
If
you are a believer, Madam, and you think your future child has one
chance in a billion to go to hell, do not do it. No life no risk.
It
is normal to defend the handicapped people, but certainly not those
who handicap. Instead, all existing, disabled or not, should file a
complaint against them. When a child is too young to defend itself,
it must have a lawyer. It is at Justice to decide whether those who
handicaps are just idiot, or worse sadistic, therefore slaver.
If
you booze and that after an accident you make a handicapped person,
the law condemns you. If you copulate and that you make a handicapped
child, everyone feels sorry for you. Where is Justice? When will
antenatal ill-treatment be treated? When will obligation of existence
be treated?
Hundred
percent of the alive ones, whose human ones, will die prematurely, or
will finish their life, physically handicapped and often mental.
While
we philosophize in a delicious way of the life that mom/dad inflicted
to us, the large Stork has just deposited 350,000 babies on planet
this very day (I specify these 24 hours):
It's
a huge shock for these kids, they just landed delicately on Earth
much of these 350,000 are physically or mentally disabled, the limbs,
head, internal organs, everything goes, a great number lands morons,
many are shattered and will survive only a few days, even a year,
hardly.
And
among all this mass of flesh for moms, only 25% have an IQ
(Intelligence Quotient) and PQ (Physics Quotient) above 100, and
you're lucky if your genes do not reserve you any cancer or Parkinson
surprise ...
Some
mothers themselves will undergo such a shock to this painful landing
that 800 of them, at least, will die, while one in seven will suffer
a pathology.
If
a good Lord made this mess, wait until I catch it, I send it directly
to the ICC!
Earth
is my home, I forbid you to add the paupers, the sickly, the
physically and mentally disabled people, and even quite bearing
anyone without my consent.
You
claim for yourself the health (which is almost free in France and
registered in the Human rights), whereas you are not even able to
ensure that the child which you force to exist will not be born
seriously handicapped! Isn't this a shame?
If
there was only one question that all those, who wish to manufacture a
new life, were to ask themselves, it should be this one:
"Now
that I have made a suffering being, how to undo suffering? "
Dead
end
E.
Berlherm (May 2016)
